Model comparison

Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Medium 3.1 Mistral AI

31.5

Rank #260 Reported

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 StepFun

38.6

Rank #173 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 24.8 to 10.1.

Side by side

Mistral Medium 3.1 and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 specifications
Mistral Medium 3.1Step 2 16k Exp 202412
ProviderMistral AIStepFun
Noometry Index31.538.6
Released——
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window131K—
Max output105K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.40—
Output $ / M tokens$2—
Results tracked312

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 37.9 (#170)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Coding—1316

Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.1 (#336), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 24.8 (#140)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Step 2 16k Exp 202412
NYT Connections (extended)6.5%—
Thematic Generalization20.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1299

Math Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 33.6 (#171)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Math—1305

Knowledge Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 34.6 (#187)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Expert—1279

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.9 (#176)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Non-English—1290
LMArena Chinese—1331
LMArena Russian—1324

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 68.1 (#187)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Instruction Following—1287

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#165)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Longer Query—1307

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.1 leads

Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.6 (#140), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.5 (#168)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Text—1321
LMArena Creative Writing—1328
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1476—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1292

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Medium 3.1 better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.1 and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper