Model comparison
Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen-7B
Mistral Medium 3.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#260); Qwen-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- Qwen-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.5 | — |
| Released | — | 2023-09-28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 105K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Reasoning Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.1 (#336), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 6.5% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 20.3% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 45% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 106.47 |
| LAMBADA | — | 67.9% |
| PIQA | — | 77.9% |
Math Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | — | 51.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 75.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 76.4% |
| MMLU | — | 45% |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.6 (#140), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1476 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Medium 3.1 better than Qwen-7B?
Mistral Medium 3.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#260); Qwen-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen-7B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-7B has 8.