Model comparison

Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Phi-4

Mistral Medium 3.1 and Phi-4 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.9 vs 31.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Medium 3.1 Mistral AI

31.9

Rank #266 Reported

Phi-4 Microsoft

31.2

Rank #279 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.1 leads 55.5 to 40.5.
  • Phi-4 is cheaper at $0.07 / $0.14 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2 for Mistral Medium 3.1.
  • Mistral Medium 3.1 accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.
  • Phi-4 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mistral Medium 3.1 and Phi-4 specifications
Mistral Medium 3.1Phi-4
ProviderMistral AIMicrosoft
Noometry Index31.931.2
Released—2024-12-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window131K128K
Max output105K4K
Input $ / M tokens$0.40$0.07
Output $ / M tokens$2$0.14
Results tracked337

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Phi-4: 34.4 (#239)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Phi-4
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.5%
LiveBench Coding—30.7%
LMArena Coding—1231
BigCodeBench Complete—55.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Phi-4: 22.8 (#128)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Phi-4
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.8%
BALROG—11.6%

Reasoning Phi-4 leads

Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341), Phi-4: 17.7 (#291)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Phi-4
NYT Connections (extended)6.5%—
Chess Puzzles—1%
Thematic Generalization20.3%—
LiveBench Reasoning—47.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1220
LiveBench Data Analysis—45.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—130.42
LiveBench—41.6%

Math Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Phi-4: 20.8 (#285)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Phi-4
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—13.8%
LiveBench Math—42%
LMArena Math—1246
MATH Level 5—64.9%

Knowledge Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Phi-4: 32.6 (#209)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Phi-4
GPQA Diamond—56.1%
Confabulations—29.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—3.7%
LMArena Expert—1203
MMLU—84.8%

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Phi-4: 37.2 (#237)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Phi-4
LMArena Non-English—1197
LMArena Chinese—1212
LMArena French—1224
LMArena German—1222
LMArena Japanese—1158
LMArena Korean—1151
LMArena Russian—1209
LMArena Spanish—1234

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Phi-4: 60.4 (#251)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Phi-4
LiveBench Instruction Following—58.4%
LMArena Instruction Following—1201

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Phi-4: 36.9 (#226)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Phi-4
LMArena Longer Query—1217

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.1 leads

Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145), Phi-4: 40.5 (#244)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Phi-4
LMArena Text—1217
LMArena Creative Writing—1182
Short-Story Creative Writing—62.6%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1476—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1206
LiveBench Language—25.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Medium 3.1 better than Phi-4?

Mistral Medium 3.1 and Phi-4 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.9 vs 31.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Phi-4?

Phi-4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.07 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.1 lists at $0.40 and $2.

Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Medium 3.1 does, with 131K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.1 and Phi-4 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper