Model comparison

Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super

Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Medium 3.1 Mistral AI

31.5

Rank #260 Reported

Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA

39.6

Rank #147 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Mistral Medium 3.1 scores higher in 0 categories and Nemotron 3 Super in 2 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Nemotron 3 Super leads 17.9 to 10.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 6.5% for Mistral Medium 3.1 and 15.4% for Nemotron 3 Super.
  • Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.45 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2 for Mistral Medium 3.1.
  • Nemotron 3 Super accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.
  • Nemotron 3 Super has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mistral Medium 3.1 and Nemotron 3 Super specifications
Mistral Medium 3.1Nemotron 3 Super
ProviderMistral AINVIDIA
Noometry Index31.539.6
Released—2026-03-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window131K262K
Max output105K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.40$0.08
Output $ / M tokens$2$0.45
Results tracked321

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#153)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Nemotron 3 Super
SciCode—36%
WeirdML—38%
LMArena Coding—1403
ALE-Bench—213.9

Reasoning Nemotron 3 Super leads

Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.1 (#336), Nemotron 3 Super: 17.9 (#274)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Nemotron 3 Super
NYT Connections (extended)6.5%15.4%
CritPt—3.1%
Thematic Generalization20.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1386

Math Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Nemotron 3 Super: 37.6 (#95)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Nemotron 3 Super
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—60.4%
LMArena Math—1381

Knowledge Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Nemotron 3 Super: 38.2 (#136)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Expert—1397

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Nemotron 3 Super: 48.6 (#139)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Non-English—1356
LMArena Chinese—1430
LMArena French—1404
LMArena German—1341
LMArena Russian—1336
LMArena Spanish—1417

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Nemotron 3 Super: 71.4 (#149)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Instruction Following—1347

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#134)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Longer Query—1362

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.6 (#140), Nemotron 3 Super: 56.1 (#135)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text—1378
LMArena Creative Writing—1317
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1476—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1369

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Medium 3.1 better than Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.1 lists at $0.40 and $2.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nemotron 3 Super does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.1 and Nemotron 3 Super share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Super has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper