Model comparison

Mistral Large vs Phi-3.5-MoE

Mistral Large has enough public results to be ranked (#263); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Large Mistral AI

31.9

Rank #263 Confirmed

Phi-3.5-MoE Microsoft

—

Unranked

Side by side

Mistral Large and Phi-3.5-MoE specifications
Mistral LargePhi-3.5-MoE
ProviderMistral AIMicrosoft
Noometry Index31.9—
Released2024-02-262024-08-17
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked513

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mistral Large: 34.3 (#240), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargePhi-3.5-MoE
SciCode36.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct30%—
LiveBench Coding47.1%—
LMArena Coding1277—
BigCodeBench Complete38.3%—
ALE-Bench264.7—
HumanEval+62.2%—
MBPP+59.5%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mistral Large: 28.6 (#89), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargePhi-3.5-MoE
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard38.4%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Mistral Large: 15.8 (#310), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargePhi-3.5-MoE
SimpleBench22.5%—
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning43.5%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1257—
DTBench65.1%—
LiveBench Data Analysis50.1%—
LMCA16.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index128.52—
ForecastBench57.1—
LiveBench48.4%—
PIQA—88.6%

Math Not comparable

Mistral Large: 18.2 (#291), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargePhi-3.5-MoE
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20258.5%—
Omni-MATH28.1%—
LiveBench Math42.5%—
LMArena Math1262—
MATH Level 550.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—
GSM8K—88.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Mistral Large: 30.1 (#230), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargePhi-3.5-MoE
GPQA Diamond51.3%—
MMLU-Pro59.9%—
Confabulations21.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate4.5%—
GPQA (HELM)43.5%—
LMArena Expert1232—
BoolQ—84.6%
MMLU80%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Large: 40.0 (#219), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargePhi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Non-English1237—
LMArena Chinese1240—
LMArena French1325—
LMArena German1254—
LMArena Japanese1188—
LMArena Korean1202—
LMArena Russian1257—
LMArena Spanish1268—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Large: 67.9 (#191), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargePhi-3.5-MoE
LiveBench Instruction Following67.9%—
IFEval87.7%—
LMArena Instruction Following1249—

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Large: 38.3 (#199), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargePhi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Longer Query1261—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Mistral Large: 40.7 (#242), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargePhi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Text1266—
LMArena Creative Writing1243—
Short-Story Creative Writing69%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing985—
WildBench80.1%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1260—
LiveBench Language39.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Large better than Phi-3.5-MoE?

Mistral Large has enough public results to be ranked (#263); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Large and Phi-3.5-MoE share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Large has 51 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-MoE has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper