Model comparison

Mistral Large vs Phi-1.5

Mistral Large has enough public results to be ranked (#258); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Large Mistral AI

31.6

Rank #258 Confirmed

Phi-1.5 Microsoft

—

Unranked

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both.

Side by side

Mistral Large and Phi-1.5 specifications
Mistral LargePhi-1.5
ProviderMistral AIMicrosoft
Noometry Index31.6—
Released2024-02-262023-09-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked517

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mistral Large: 33.8 (#240), Phi-1.5: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargePhi-1.5
SciCode36.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct30%—
LiveBench Coding47.1%—
LMArena Coding1277—
BigCodeBench Complete38.3%—
ALE-Bench264.7—
HumanEval+62.2%—
MBPP+59.5%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mistral Large: 28.4 (#83), Phi-1.5: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargePhi-1.5
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard38.4%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Mistral Large: 15.4 (#305), Phi-1.5: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargePhi-1.5
Epoch Capabilities Index128.5290.82
SimpleBench22.5%—
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning43.5%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1257—
DTBench65.1%—
LiveBench Data Analysis50.1%—
LMCA16.7%—
ForecastBench57.1—
HellaSwag—47.6%
LiveBench48.4%—
WinoGrande—73.4%

Math Not comparable

Mistral Large: 17.1 (#285), Phi-1.5: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargePhi-1.5
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20258.5%—
Omni-MATH28.1%—
LiveBench Math42.5%—
LMArena Math1262—
MATH Level 550.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Mistral Large: 30.0 (#224), Phi-1.5: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargePhi-1.5
MMLU80%37.6%
GPQA Diamond51.3%—
MMLU-Pro59.9%—
Confabulations21.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate4.5%—
GPQA (HELM)43.5%—
LMArena Expert1232—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—44.4%
BoolQ—75.8%
OpenBookQA—37.2%

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Large: 40.1 (#214), Phi-1.5: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargePhi-1.5
LMArena Non-English1237—
LMArena Chinese1240—
LMArena French1324—
LMArena German1254—
LMArena Japanese1187—
LMArena Korean1202—
LMArena Russian1257—
LMArena Spanish1268—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Large: 68.1 (#186), Phi-1.5: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargePhi-1.5
LiveBench Instruction Following67.9%—
IFEval87.7%—
LMArena Instruction Following1249—

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Large: 38.3 (#194), Phi-1.5: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargePhi-1.5
LMArena Longer Query1262—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Mistral Large: 40.9 (#237), Phi-1.5: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargePhi-1.5
LMArena Text1266—
LMArena Creative Writing1243—
Short-Story Creative Writing69%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing985—
WildBench80.1%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1260—
LiveBench Language39.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Large better than Phi-1.5?

Mistral Large has enough public results to be ranked (#258); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Large and Phi-1.5 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Large has 51 scored results on Noometry and Phi-1.5 has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper