Model comparison

Mistral Large vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 24 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Large Mistral AI

31.9

Rank #263 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.8

Rank #27 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Large scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.3 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 73.1 to 18.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 8.5% for Mistral Large and 99.2% for Muse Spark 1.3.
  • Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper at $1.25 / $4.25 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Mistral Large.
  • Muse Spark 1.3 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
  • Mistral Large has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mistral Large and Muse Spark 1.3 specifications
Mistral LargeMuse Spark 1.3
ProviderMistral AIMeta
Noometry Index31.954.8
Released2024-02-262026-09-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window131K1.05M
Max output16K131K
Input $ / M tokens$2$1.25
Output $ / M tokens$6$4.25
Results tracked5137

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Mistral Large: 34.3 (#240), Muse Spark 1.3: 56.6 (#21)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargeMuse Spark 1.3
SciCode36.2%59.7%
LMArena Coding12771514
CursorBench—41.6%
LMArena WebDev—1657
BigCodeBench Instruct30%—
LiveBench Coding47.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete38.3%—
ALE-Bench264.7—
HumanEval+62.2%—
MBPP+59.5%—

Agentic & Tool Use Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Mistral Large: 28.6 (#89), Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#30)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargeMuse Spark 1.3
APEX-Agents—57.8%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard38.4%—
GDP.pdf—27.6%

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Mistral Large: 15.8 (#310), Muse Spark 1.3: 54.0 (#27)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargeMuse Spark 1.3
CritPt0%26%
LMArena Hard Prompts12571503
DTBench65.1%96.5%
LMCA16.7%53.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index128.52156.75
SimpleBench22.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
Chess Puzzles—38%
LiveBench Reasoning43.5%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—25%
LiveBench Data Analysis50.1%—
Bench to the Future 3—0.14
ForecastBench57.1—
LiveBench48.4%—

Math Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Mistral Large: 18.2 (#291), Muse Spark 1.3: 73.1 (#21)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargeMuse Spark 1.3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20258.5%99.2%
LMArena Math12621494
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
ProofBench—58%
Omni-MATH28.1%—
LiveBench Math42.5%—
MATH Level 550.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Mistral Large: 30.1 (#230), Muse Spark 1.3: 42.6 (#95)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargeMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Expert12321516
GPQA Diamond51.3%—
MMLU-Pro59.9%—
Confabulations21.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate4.5%—
GPQA (HELM)43.5%—
MMLU80%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Large: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 43.7 (#22)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargeMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision—1309
LMArena Document—1471

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Mistral Large: 40.0 (#219), Muse Spark 1.3: 57.4 (#8)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargeMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Non-English12371481
LMArena Chinese12401529
LMArena French13251524
LMArena German12541515
LMArena Japanese11881474
LMArena Korean12021501
LMArena Russian12571490
LMArena Spanish12681490

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Mistral Large: 67.9 (#191), Muse Spark 1.3: 77.5 (#22)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargeMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Instruction Following12491477
LiveBench Instruction Following67.9%—
IFEval87.7%—

Long Context Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Mistral Large: 38.3 (#199), Muse Spark 1.3: 45.6 (#32)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargeMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Longer Query12611488

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Mistral Large: 40.7 (#242), Muse Spark 1.3: 73.6 (#9)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral LargeMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text12661490
LMArena Creative Writing12431455
EQ-Bench Creative Writing9851906
LMArena Multi-Turn12601482
Short-Story Creative Writing69%—
WildBench80.1%—
LiveBench Language39.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Large better than Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Large or Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; Mistral Large lists at $2 and $6.

Is Mistral Large or Muse Spark 1.3 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.6 versus 34.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.3 does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Large and Muse Spark 1.3 share?

24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Large has 51 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.3 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper