Model comparison
Mistral Large 4 vs Ring-2.6-1T
Mistral Large 4 has enough public results to be ranked (#99); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Ant Group (inclusionAI)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Mistral Large 4 leads 48.6 to 40.7.
- Ring-2.6-1T has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mistral Large 4 | Ring-2.6-1T | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 36.9 |
| Released | 2026-10-06 | 2026-05-14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 262K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.68 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.09 | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mistral Large 4 leads
Mistral Large 4: 48.6 (#57), Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1541 | — |
| SciCode | — | 42.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1475 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |
Reasoning Ring-2.6-1T leads
Mistral Large 4: 22.5 (#192), Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 27.4% | — |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1444 | — |
Math Not comparable
Mistral Large 4: 40.4 (#91), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1488 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mistral Large 4: 36.6 (#166), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | 20% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Large 4: 52.6 (#82), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1415 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1491 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1414 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Large 4: 75.0 (#76), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1424 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Large 4: 43.6 (#89), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1429 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Mistral Large 4: 60.4 (#97), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1361 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1424 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Large 4 better than Ring-2.6-1T?
Mistral Large 4 has enough public results to be ranked (#99); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Mistral Large 4 or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?
Mistral Large 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 40.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Large 4 and Ring-2.6-1T share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Large 4 has 15 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.