Model comparison

Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.6 27B

Mistral Large 4 and Qwen3.6 27B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.1 vs 42.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI

43.1

Rank #99 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 27B Alibaba (Qwen)

42.2

Rank #117 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 27B leads 52.4 to 36.6.
  • Mistral Large 4 is cheaper at $0.68 / $2.09 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $3.60 for Qwen3.6 27B.
  • Mistral Large 4 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
  • Qwen3.6 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mistral Large 4 and Qwen3.6 27B specifications
Mistral Large 4Qwen3.6 27B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.142.2
Released2026-10-062026-04-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M262K
Max output262K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.68$0.60
Output $ / M tokens$2.09$3.60
Results tracked1511

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Large 4 leads

Mistral Large 4: 48.6 (#57), Qwen3.6 27B: 39.1 (#163)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 4Qwen3.6 27B
LMArena WebDev1541—
SciCode—37.3%
LMArena Coding1475—

Reasoning Qwen3.6 27B leads

Mistral Large 4: 22.5 (#192), Qwen3.6 27B: 25.0 (#153)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 4Qwen3.6 27B
NYT Connections (extended)27.4%—
CritPt—0.9%
Chess Puzzles—22%
LMArena Hard Prompts1444—
Mystery Game Puzzles—7%
DTBench—78.1%
LMCA—34.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.5

Math Qwen3.6 27B leads

Mistral Large 4: 40.4 (#91), Qwen3.6 27B: 48.5 (#62)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 4Qwen3.6 27B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—35.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—91.1%
LMArena Math1488—

Knowledge Qwen3.6 27B leads

Mistral Large 4: 36.6 (#166), Qwen3.6 27B: 52.4 (#63)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 4Qwen3.6 27B
GPQA Diamond—85.9%
SimpleQA Verified20%—
LMArena Expert1447—

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Large 4: 52.6 (#82), Qwen3.6 27B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 4Qwen3.6 27B
LMArena Non-English1415—
LMArena Chinese1491—
LMArena Russian1414—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Large 4: 75.0 (#76), Qwen3.6 27B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 4Qwen3.6 27B
LMArena Instruction Following1424—

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Large 4: 43.6 (#89), Qwen3.6 27B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 4Qwen3.6 27B
LMArena Longer Query1429—

Writing & Preference Mistral Large 4 leads

Mistral Large 4: 60.4 (#97), Qwen3.6 27B: 50.3 (#181)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 4Qwen3.6 27B
LMArena Text1427—
LMArena Creative Writing1361—
EQ-Bench 4—1026
LMArena Multi-Turn1424—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Large 4 better than Qwen3.6 27B?

Mistral Large 4 and Qwen3.6 27B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.1 vs 42.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Large 4 or Qwen3.6 27B?

Mistral Large 4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.68 per million input tokens and $2.09 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 27B lists at $0.60 and $3.60.

Is Mistral Large 4 or Qwen3.6 27B better for coding?

Mistral Large 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 39.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Large 4 does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Large 4 and Qwen3.6 27B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Large 4 has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 27B has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper