Model comparison

Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3 14B

Mistral Large 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 14B costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Large 4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI

43.1

Rank #99 Confirmed

Qwen3 14B Alibaba (Qwen)

35.5

Rank #225 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where Mistral Large 4 leads 48.6 to 37.3.
  • Qwen3 14B is cheaper at $0.35 / $1.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.68 / $2.09 for Mistral Large 4.
  • Mistral Large 4 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
  • Qwen3 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mistral Large 4 and Qwen3 14B specifications
Mistral Large 4Qwen3 14B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.135.5
Released2026-10-062025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M131K
Max output262K8K
Input $ / M tokens$0.68$0.35
Output $ / M tokens$2.09$1.40
Results tracked1512

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Large 4 leads

Mistral Large 4: 48.6 (#57), Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 4Qwen3 14B
LMArena WebDev1541—
SciCode—31.6%
LMArena Coding1475—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mistral Large 4: —, Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 4Qwen3 14B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—41%

Reasoning Mistral Large 4 leads

Mistral Large 4: 22.5 (#192), Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 4Qwen3 14B
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.1%
NYT Connections (extended)27.4%—
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—4%
LMArena Hard Prompts1444—
DTBench—64%
LMCA—18.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—138.23

Math Mistral Large 4 leads

Mistral Large 4: 40.4 (#91), Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 4Qwen3 14B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—66.4%
LMArena Math1488—

Knowledge Qwen3 14B leads

Mistral Large 4: 36.6 (#166), Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 4Qwen3 14B
GPQA Diamond—63.8%
SimpleQA Verified20%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.4%
LMArena Expert1447—

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Large 4: 52.6 (#82), Qwen3 14B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 4Qwen3 14B
LMArena Non-English1415—
LMArena Chinese1491—
LMArena Russian1414—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Large 4: 75.0 (#76), Qwen3 14B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 4Qwen3 14B
LMArena Instruction Following1424—

Long Context Mistral Large 4 leads

Mistral Large 4: 43.6 (#89), Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 4Qwen3 14B
Fiction.LiveBench—62.5%
LMArena Longer Query1429—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Mistral Large 4: 60.4 (#97), Qwen3 14B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 4Qwen3 14B
LMArena Text1427—
LMArena Creative Writing1361—
LMArena Multi-Turn1424—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Large 4 better than Qwen3 14B?

Mistral Large 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 14B costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Large 4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Large 4 or Qwen3 14B?

Qwen3 14B is cheaper. It lists at $0.35 per million input tokens and $1.40 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 4 lists at $0.68 and $2.09.

Is Mistral Large 4 or Qwen3 14B better for coding?

Mistral Large 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 37.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Large 4 does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Large 4 and Qwen3 14B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Large 4 has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper