Model comparison

Mistral Large 3 vs Qwen1.5-32B

Mistral Large 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI

39.1

Rank #176 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-32B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.5

Rank #293 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Large 3 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Large 3 leads 60.0 to 34.2.

Side by side

Mistral Large 3 and Qwen1.5-32B specifications
Mistral Large 3Qwen1.5-32B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.130.5
Released2025-12-022024-02-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.25—
Output $ / M tokens$0.75—
Results tracked2421

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Large 3 leads

Mistral Large 3: 34.4 (#237), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Coding14481155
LMArena WebDev1230—
BigCodeBench Instruct—32.3%
BigCodeBench Complete—42%

Reasoning Qwen1.5-32B leads

Mistral Large 3: 15.2 (#319), Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Hard Prompts14291130
Kagi LLM Benchmark50.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)7.5%—
Thematic Generalization23%—

Math Mistral Large 3 leads

Mistral Large 3: 38.7 (#129), Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Math14141155

Knowledge Mistral Large 3 leads

Mistral Large 3: 36.0 (#177), Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Expert14211126
GPQA Diamond—30.7%
Vectara Hallucination Rate14.5%—
MMLU—74.4%

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Large 3: 38.2 (#66), Qwen1.5-32B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Vision1221—

Multilingual Mistral Large 3 leads

Mistral Large 3: 52.5 (#84), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Non-English14131106
LMArena Chinese14471177
LMArena French14551101
LMArena German14371058
LMArena Japanese13941027
LMArena Korean13841008
LMArena Russian14111073
LMArena Spanish14401089

Instruction Following Mistral Large 3 leads

Mistral Large 3: 74.0 (#108), Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Instruction Following14031116

Long Context Mistral Large 3 leads

Mistral Large 3: 43.1 (#105), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Longer Query14131146

Writing & Preference Mistral Large 3 leads

Mistral Large 3: 60.0 (#101), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Text14281137
LMArena Creative Writing13861083
LMArena Multi-Turn14291140
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1412—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Large 3 better than Qwen1.5-32B?

Mistral Large 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mistral Large 3 or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?

Mistral Large 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.4 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Large 3 and Qwen1.5-32B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Large 3 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper