Model comparison

Mistral 7B vs Qwen3-1.7B

Qwen3-1.7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 26.6 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Mistral 7B Mistral AI

23.0

Rank #351 Confirmed

Qwen3-1.7B Alibaba (Qwen)

26.6

Rank #336 Reported

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-1.7B in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-1.7B leads 19.6 to 7.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 15.2% for Mistral 7B and 38% for Qwen3-1.7B.

Side by side

Mistral 7B and Qwen3-1.7B specifications
Mistral 7BQwen3-1.7B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index23.026.6
Released2023-09-272025-04-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window8K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.25—
Output $ / M tokens$0.25—
Results tracked374

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mistral 7B: 26.4 (#326), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral 7BQwen3-1.7B
BigCodeBench Instruct19.5%—
LMArena Coding1082—
BigCodeBench Complete27.3%—
HumanEval+36%—
MBPP+42.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mistral 7B: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral 7BQwen3-1.7B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.4%

Reasoning Qwen3-1.7B leads

Mistral 7B: 13.1 (#336), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral 7BQwen3-1.7B
Chess Puzzles0%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts1067—
DTBench42.5%—
Adversarial NLI47.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard56.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index112.21—
HellaSwag81%—
PIQA83%—
WinoGrande75.3%—

Math Qwen3-1.7B leads

Mistral 7B: 8.1 (#325), Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral 7BQwen3-1.7B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.3%8.1%
LMArena Math1085—
MATH Level 53.7%—
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Qwen3-1.7B leads

Mistral 7B: 7.4 (#311), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral 7BQwen3-1.7B
GPQA Diamond15.2%38%
LMArena Expert1036—
ARC (AI2) Challenge78.6%—
BoolQ87.4%—
MMLU62.5%—
OpenBookQA79.8%—
TriviaQA75.2%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral 7B: 25.8 (#283), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral 7BQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Non-English1012—
LMArena Chinese1009—
LMArena French1037—
LMArena German987—
LMArena Japanese878—
LMArena Russian1018—
LMArena Spanish1026—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral 7B: 54.2 (#280), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral 7BQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Instruction Following1060—

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral 7B: 32.2 (#271), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral 7BQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Longer Query1060—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Mistral 7B: 30.7 (#286), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral 7BQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Text1090—
LMArena Creative Writing1068—
LMArena Multi-Turn1062—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral 7B better than Qwen3-1.7B?

Qwen3-1.7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 26.6 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Mistral 7B and Qwen3-1.7B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral 7B has 37 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.

Related comparisons

Go deeper