Model comparison
Mistral 7B vs Qwen1.5-110B
Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.2 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen1.5-110B leads 33.7 to 8.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 27.3% for Mistral 7B and 44.4% for Qwen1.5-110B.
Side by side
| Mistral 7B | Qwen1.5-110B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 23.0 | 34.2 |
| Released | 2023-09-27 | 2024-04-25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 8K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.25 | — |
| Results tracked | 37 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen1.5-110B leads
Mistral 7B: 26.4 (#326), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 19.5% | 35% |
| LMArena Coding | 1082 | 1184 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 27.3% | 44.4% |
| HumanEval+ | 36% | — |
| MBPP+ | 42.1% | — |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-110B leads
Mistral 7B: 13.1 (#336), Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1067 | 1168 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 42.5% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 47.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 56.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.21 | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |
| HellaSwag | 81% | — |
| PIQA | 83% | — |
| WinoGrande | 75.3% | — |
Math Qwen1.5-110B leads
Mistral 7B: 8.1 (#325), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)
| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1085 | 1185 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 3.7% | — |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Qwen1.5-110B leads
Mistral 7B: 7.4 (#311), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)
| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | 1144 |
| GPQA Diamond | 15.2% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 87.4% | — |
| MMLU | 62.5% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 79.8% | — |
| TriviaQA | 75.2% | — |
Multilingual Qwen1.5-110B leads
Mistral 7B: 25.8 (#283), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)
| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1012 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1009 | 1206 |
| LMArena French | 1037 | 1151 |
| LMArena German | 987 | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | 878 | 1074 |
| LMArena Russian | 1018 | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1026 | 1142 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1044 |
Instruction Following Qwen1.5-110B leads
Mistral 7B: 54.2 (#280), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)
| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1060 | 1158 |
Long Context Qwen1.5-110B leads
Mistral 7B: 32.2 (#271), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)
| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1060 | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Qwen1.5-110B leads
Mistral 7B: 30.7 (#286), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)
| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1090 | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1068 | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1062 | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral 7B better than Qwen1.5-110B?
Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.2 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Mistral 7B or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?
Qwen1.5-110B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.0 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Mistral 7B and Qwen1.5-110B share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral 7B has 37 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.