Model comparison

Ministral 8B vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.4 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 8B costs 38× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Ministral 8B Mistral AI

27.8

Rank #321 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.4

Rank #35 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Ministral 8B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 61.7 to 12.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 27.1% for Ministral 8B and 90.9% for Qwen3.7 Max.
  • Ministral 8B is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.10 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3.7 Max.
  • Qwen3.7 Max accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
  • Ministral 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Ministral 8B and Qwen3.7 Max specifications
Ministral 8BQwen3.7 Max
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index27.851.4
Released2024-10-012026-05-19
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K1M
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.10$2.50
Output $ / M tokens$0.10$7.50
Results tracked1733

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads

Ministral 8B: 34.4 (#226), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.2 (#43)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Coding12021498
SWE-bench Verified—77.3%
LMArena WebDev—1515
SciCode—48.8%
ALE-Bench—1,189

Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3.7 Max leads

Ministral 8B: 16.2 (#140), Qwen3.7 Max: 21.8 (#129)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BQwen3.7 Max
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard11.1%—
GBAEval—0.4%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads

Ministral 8B: 17.7 (#279), Qwen3.7 Max: 48.4 (#36)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts11911483
DTBench45.7%92.3%
SimpleBench—70.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—13.4%
Chess Puzzles—19%
EBR-Bench—9.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
LMCA—44%
Epoch Capabilities Index—153.74

Math Qwen3.7 Max leads

Ministral 8B: 23.7 (#262), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.3 (#26)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Math11881488
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—34.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
ProofBench—26%
MATH Level 514.9%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads

Ministral 8B: 12.5 (#292), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.7 (#24)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BQwen3.7 Max
GPQA Diamond27.1%90.9%
LMArena Expert11701488
SimpleQA Verified—55.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Max leads

Ministral 8B: 35.3 (#242), Qwen3.7 Max: 57.1 (#13)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English11651475
LMArena Chinese11931533
LMArena Russian11951482

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Max leads

Ministral 8B: 60.7 (#245), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.9 (#34)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following11611460

Long Context Qwen3.7 Max leads

Ministral 8B: 36.7 (#222), Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#34)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query12121484

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Max leads

Ministral 8B: 39.8 (#241), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.2 (#52)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text11911476
LMArena Creative Writing11751450
LMArena Multi-Turn11661482
EQ-Bench 4—1110

Frequently asked questions

Is Ministral 8B better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.4 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 8B costs 38× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Ministral 8B or Qwen3.7 Max?

Ministral 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max lists at $2.50 and $7.50.

Is Ministral 8B or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.2 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Max does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Ministral 8B and Qwen3.7 Max share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Ministral 8B has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper