Model comparison

Ministral 8B vs Qwen Turbo

Ministral 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.2 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Ministral 8B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Ministral 8B Mistral AI

28.2

Rank #325 Confirmed

Qwen Turbo Alibaba (Qwen)

27.1

Rank #335 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Ministral 8B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen Turbo in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Ministral 8B leads 25.7 to 15.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 14.9% for Ministral 8B and 56.2% for Qwen Turbo.
  • Qwen Turbo is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.15 for Ministral 8B.
  • Qwen Turbo accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • Ministral 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Ministral 8B and Qwen Turbo specifications
Ministral 8BQwen Turbo
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index28.227.1
Released2024-10-012024-11-01
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K1M
Max output262K16K
Input $ / M tokens$0.15$0.05
Output $ / M tokens$0.15$0.20
Results tracked173

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Ministral 8B: 35.0 (#230), Qwen Turbo: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BQwen Turbo
LMArena Coding1202—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Ministral 8B: 16.4 (#148), Qwen Turbo: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BQwen Turbo
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard11.1%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Ministral 8B: 18.4 (#281), Qwen Turbo: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BQwen Turbo
LMArena Hard Prompts1191—
DTBench45.7%—

Math Ministral 8B leads

Ministral 8B: 25.7 (#267), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BQwen Turbo
MATH Level 514.9%56.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—6.1%
LMArena Math1188—

Knowledge Qwen Turbo leads

Ministral 8B: 12.6 (#297), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BQwen Turbo
GPQA Diamond27.1%41.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—
LMArena Expert1170—

Multilingual Not comparable

Ministral 8B: 35.1 (#247), Qwen Turbo: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BQwen Turbo
LMArena Non-English1165—
LMArena Chinese1193—
LMArena Russian1195—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Ministral 8B: 60.5 (#250), Qwen Turbo: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BQwen Turbo
LMArena Instruction Following1161—

Long Context Not comparable

Ministral 8B: 36.7 (#227), Qwen Turbo: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BQwen Turbo
LMArena Longer Query1212—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Ministral 8B: 39.6 (#246), Qwen Turbo: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BQwen Turbo
LMArena Text1191—
LMArena Creative Writing1175—
LMArena Multi-Turn1166—

Frequently asked questions

Is Ministral 8B better than Qwen Turbo?

Ministral 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.2 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Ministral 8B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Ministral 8B or Qwen Turbo?

Qwen Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Ministral 8B lists at $0.15 and $0.15.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Turbo does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Ministral 8B and Qwen Turbo share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Ministral 8B has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper