Model comparison
Ministral 8B vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Ministral 8B scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 35.0 to 12.6.
Side by side
| Ministral 8B | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 28.2 | 38.7 |
| Released | 2024-10-01 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 262K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Ministral 8B: 35.0 (#230), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1202 | 1319 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Ministral 8B: 16.4 (#148), Olmo 3 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 11.1% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Ministral 8B: 18.4 (#281), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1191 | 1302 |
| DTBench | 45.7% | — |
Math Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Ministral 8B: 25.7 (#267), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1316 |
| MATH Level 5 | 14.9% | — |
Knowledge Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Ministral 8B: 12.6 (#297), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1170 | 1273 |
| GPQA Diamond | 27.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.4% | — |
Multilingual Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Ministral 8B: 35.1 (#247), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1165 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1193 | 1300 |
| LMArena Russian | 1195 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |
Instruction Following Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Ministral 8B: 60.5 (#250), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1161 | 1275 |
Long Context Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Ministral 8B: 36.7 (#227), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1212 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Ministral 8B: 39.6 (#246), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1175 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1166 | 1290 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Ministral 8B better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Ministral 8B or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 35.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Ministral 8B and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Ministral 8B has 17 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.