Model comparison

Ministral 3B vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 14× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Step 5 Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Ministral 3B Mistral AI

26.2

Rank #338 Confirmed

Step 5 Preview StepFun

47.9

Rank #58 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Step 5 Preview leads 41.2 to 10.4.
  • Ministral 3B is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.10 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $2.70 for Step 5 Preview.
  • Step 5 Preview accepts more context: 1.02M tokens versus 131K.
  • Ministral 3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Ministral 3B and Step 5 Preview specifications
Ministral 3BStep 5 Preview
ProviderMistral AIStepFun
Noometry Index26.247.9
Released2024-10-012026-09-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window131K1.02M
Max output262K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.10$1
Output $ / M tokens$0.10$2.70
Results tracked618

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Ministral 3B: —, Step 5 Preview: 51.8 (#36)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 3BStep 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev—1564
SciCode—58.9%
LMArena Coding—1480

Reasoning Step 5 Preview leads

Ministral 3B: 18.4 (#282), Step 5 Preview: 40.0 (#57)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 3BStep 5 Preview
CritPt—20.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1465
DTBench51.7%—
LMCA5.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.1—

Math Step 5 Preview leads

Ministral 3B: 26.6 (#258), Step 5 Preview: 46.1 (#72)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 3BStep 5 Preview
ProofBench—42%
LMArena Math—1470
MATH Level 514.4%—

Knowledge Step 5 Preview leads

Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#302), Step 5 Preview: 41.2 (#112)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 3BStep 5 Preview
GPQA Diamond25.3%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.3%—
LMArena Expert—1470

Multimodal Not comparable

Ministral 3B: —, Step 5 Preview: 41.0 (#41)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 3BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Vision—1267

Multilingual Not comparable

Ministral 3B: —, Step 5 Preview: 53.8 (#54)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 3BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Non-English—1432
LMArena Chinese—1519
LMArena Russian—1436
LMArena Spanish—1439

Instruction Following Not comparable

Ministral 3B: —, Step 5 Preview: 76.0 (#50)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 3BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Instruction Following—1444

Long Context Not comparable

Ministral 3B: —, Step 5 Preview: 44.5 (#64)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 3BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Longer Query—1455

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Ministral 3B: —, Step 5 Preview: 62.8 (#71)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 3BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Text—1442
LMArena Creative Writing—1410
LMArena Multi-Turn—1447

Frequently asked questions

Is Ministral 3B better than Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 14× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Step 5 Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Ministral 3B or Step 5 Preview?

Ministral 3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens; Step 5 Preview lists at $1 and $2.70.

Which has the bigger context window?

Step 5 Preview does, with 1.02M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Ministral 3B and Step 5 Preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Ministral 3B has 6 scored results on Noometry and Step 5 Preview has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper