Model comparison

Ministral 3B vs Qwen Plus

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 25.6 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 15× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Ministral 3B Mistral AI

25.6

Rank #336 Confirmed

Qwen Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

36.7

Rank #204 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Ministral 3B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen Plus in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen Plus leads 27.4 to 10.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 14.4% for Ministral 3B and 65.3% for Qwen Plus.
  • Ministral 3B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.04 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.20 for Qwen Plus.
  • Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
  • Ministral 3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Ministral 3B and Qwen Plus specifications
Ministral 3BQwen Plus
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index25.636.7
Released2024-10-012024-01-25
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K1M
Max output128K33K
Input $ / M tokens$0.04$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$0.04$1.20
Results tracked620

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Ministral 3B: —, Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 3BQwen Plus
LMArena Coding—1328

Reasoning Qwen Plus leads

Ministral 3B: 17.7 (#278), Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 3BQwen Plus
DTBench51.7%81.1%
LMCA5.5%24%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—63.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1317
Epoch Capabilities Index118.08—

Math Ministral 3B leads

Ministral 3B: 24.5 (#257), Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 3BQwen Plus
MATH Level 514.4%65.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—17.8%
LMArena Math—1326
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge Qwen Plus leads

Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#297), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 3BQwen Plus
GPQA Diamond25.3%48.1%
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.3%—
LMArena Expert—1328

Multilingual Not comparable

Ministral 3B: —, Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 3BQwen Plus
LMArena Non-English—1310
LMArena Chinese—1347
LMArena Japanese—1251
LMArena Russian—1323

Instruction Following Not comparable

Ministral 3B: —, Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 3BQwen Plus
LMArena Instruction Following—1303

Long Context Not comparable

Ministral 3B: —, Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 3BQwen Plus
LMArena Longer Query—1325

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Ministral 3B: —, Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 3BQwen Plus
LMArena Text—1326
LMArena Creative Writing—1293
LMArena Multi-Turn—1336

Frequently asked questions

Is Ministral 3B better than Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 25.6 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 15× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Ministral 3B or Qwen Plus?

Ministral 3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.04 per million output tokens; Qwen Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.20.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Ministral 3B and Qwen Plus share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Ministral 3B has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper