Model comparison

Ministral 3B vs Phi-4

Phi-4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Ministral 3B Mistral AI

26.2

Rank #338 Confirmed

Phi-4 Microsoft

31.2

Rank #279 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Ministral 3B scores higher in 2 categories and Phi-4 in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Phi-4 leads 32.6 to 10.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 14.4% for Ministral 3B and 64.9% for Phi-4.
  • Phi-4 is cheaper at $0.07 / $0.14 per million input/output tokens, against $0.10 / $0.10 for Ministral 3B.
  • Ministral 3B accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Ministral 3B and Phi-4 specifications
Ministral 3BPhi-4
ProviderMistral AIMicrosoft
Noometry Index26.231.2
Released2024-10-012024-12-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K128K
Max output262K4K
Input $ / M tokens$0.10$0.07
Output $ / M tokens$0.10$0.14
Results tracked637

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Ministral 3B: —, Phi-4: 34.4 (#239)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 3BPhi-4
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.5%
LiveBench Coding—30.7%
LMArena Coding—1231
BigCodeBench Complete—55.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Ministral 3B: —, Phi-4: 22.8 (#128)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 3BPhi-4
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.8%
BALROG—11.6%

Reasoning Too close to call

Ministral 3B: 18.4 (#282), Phi-4: 17.7 (#291)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 3BPhi-4
Epoch Capabilities Index118.1130.42
Chess Puzzles—1%
LiveBench Reasoning—47.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1220
DTBench51.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—45.2%
LMCA5.5%—
LiveBench—41.6%

Math Ministral 3B leads

Ministral 3B: 26.6 (#258), Phi-4: 20.8 (#285)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 3BPhi-4
MATH Level 514.4%64.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—13.8%
LiveBench Math—42%
LMArena Math—1246

Knowledge Phi-4 leads

Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#302), Phi-4: 32.6 (#209)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 3BPhi-4
GPQA Diamond25.3%56.1%
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.3%3.7%
Confabulations—29.4%
LMArena Expert—1203
MMLU—84.8%

Multilingual Not comparable

Ministral 3B: —, Phi-4: 37.2 (#237)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 3BPhi-4
LMArena Non-English—1197
LMArena Chinese—1212
LMArena French—1224
LMArena German—1222
LMArena Japanese—1158
LMArena Korean—1151
LMArena Russian—1209
LMArena Spanish—1234

Instruction Following Not comparable

Ministral 3B: —, Phi-4: 60.4 (#251)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 3BPhi-4
LiveBench Instruction Following—58.4%
LMArena Instruction Following—1201

Long Context Not comparable

Ministral 3B: —, Phi-4: 36.9 (#226)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 3BPhi-4
LMArena Longer Query—1217

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Ministral 3B: —, Phi-4: 40.5 (#244)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 3BPhi-4
LMArena Text—1217
LMArena Creative Writing—1182
Short-Story Creative Writing—62.6%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1206
LiveBench Language—25.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Ministral 3B better than Phi-4?

Phi-4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Ministral 3B or Phi-4?

Phi-4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.07 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; Ministral 3B lists at $0.10 and $0.10.

Which has the bigger context window?

Ministral 3B does, with 131K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Ministral 3B and Phi-4 share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Ministral 3B has 6 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper