Model comparison

MiniMax-M2 vs Qwen1.5-110B

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2 MiniMax

37.4

Rank #204 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-110B Alibaba (Qwen)

34.2

Rank #234 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2 leads 53.0 to 38.0.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2 and Qwen1.5-110B specifications
MiniMax-M2Qwen1.5-110B
ProviderMiniMaxAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.434.2
Released2025-10-272024-04-25
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked2120

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Coding13701184
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)61%—
LMArena WebDev1297—
BigCodeBench Instruct—35%
BigCodeBench Complete—44.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109), Qwen1.5-110B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Qwen1.5-110B
Terminal-Bench30%—
Vending-Bench 2160.6—

Reasoning Qwen1.5-110B leads

MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258), Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Hard Prompts13571168
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.8%—
NYT Connections (extended)14.8%—
ForecastBench—57.7

Math MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Math13521185

Knowledge MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Expert13371144

Multilingual MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Non-English13131142
LMArena Chinese13661206
LMArena French13351151
LMArena German13551123
LMArena Russian13311118
LMArena Spanish13261142
LMArena Japanese—1074
LMArena Korean—1044

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Instruction Following13281158

Long Context MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Longer Query13311157

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Text13401175
LMArena Creative Writing12861148
LMArena Multi-Turn13611160

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2 better than Qwen1.5-110B?

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiniMax-M2 or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?

MiniMax-M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.3 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2 and Qwen1.5-110B share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper