Model comparison

MiniMax-M2 vs Ministral 3B

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 5.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiniMax-M2's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2 MiniMax

37.4

Rank #204 Confirmed

Ministral 3B Mistral AI

26.2

Rank #338 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M2 leads 37.0 to 10.4.
  • Ministral 3B is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.10 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M2.
  • MiniMax-M2 accepts more context: 205K tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2 and Ministral 3B specifications
MiniMax-M2Ministral 3B
ProviderMiniMaxMistral AI
Noometry Index37.426.2
Released2025-10-272024-10-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window205K131K
Max output131K262K
Input $ / M tokens$0.30$0.10
Output $ / M tokens$1.20$0.10
Results tracked216

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159), Ministral 3B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Ministral 3B
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)61%—
LMArena WebDev1297—
LMArena Coding1370—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109), Ministral 3B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Ministral 3B
Terminal-Bench30%—
Vending-Bench 2160.6—

Reasoning MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258), Ministral 3B: 18.4 (#282)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Ministral 3B
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.8%—
NYT Connections (extended)14.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1357—
DTBench—51.7%
LMCA—5.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—118.1

Math MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160), Ministral 3B: 26.6 (#258)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Ministral 3B
LMArena Math1352—
MATH Level 5—14.4%

Knowledge MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163), Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#302)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Ministral 3B
GPQA Diamond—25.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.3%
LMArena Expert1337—

Multilingual Not comparable

MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171), Ministral 3B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Ministral 3B
LMArena Non-English1313—
LMArena Chinese1366—
LMArena French1335—
LMArena German1355—
LMArena Russian1331—
LMArena Spanish1326—

Instruction Following Not comparable

MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166), Ministral 3B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Ministral 3B
LMArena Instruction Following1328—

Long Context Not comparable

MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153), Ministral 3B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Ministral 3B
LMArena Longer Query1331—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162), Ministral 3B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Ministral 3B
LMArena Text1340—
LMArena Creative Writing1286—
LMArena Multi-Turn1361—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2 better than Ministral 3B?

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 5.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiniMax-M2's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2 or Ministral 3B?

Ministral 3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M2 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiniMax-M2 does, with 205K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2 and Ministral 3B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 3B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper