Model comparison
MiniMax-M2.7 vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
MiniMax
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher in 7 categories and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.7 leads 59.1 to 31.3.
Side by side
| MiniMax-M2.7 | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 37.4 | 28.8 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 205K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 30 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M2.7 leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 41.4 (#115), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.4 (#313)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1102 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1397 | — |
| SciCode | 47% | — |
| WeirdML | 37% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 20.3% |
| ALE-Bench | 599.25 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#103), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 45.1% | — |
| ExploitBench | 13.3% | — |
| GBAEval | 0% | — |
Reasoning MiniMax-M2.7 leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 19.0 (#248), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.2 (#319)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1422 | 1100 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 24.7% | — |
| CritPt | 0.6% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 39.3% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 15.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 30.3% |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 58.1% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 79.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.84 | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 77% |
| LiveBench | — | 24% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math Too close to call
MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#254), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 25.4 (#247)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1420 | 1151 |
| ProofBench | 3% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge MiniMax-M2.7 leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 37.1 (#151), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#237)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1443 | 1067 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12.9% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 90.7% |
| MMLU | — | 75.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 88% |
| TriviaQA | — | 58.1% |
Multilingual MiniMax-M2.7 leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 50.5 (#120), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.6 (#267)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1439 | 1061 |
| LMArena French | 1422 | 1134 |
| LMArena German | 1398 | 1080 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1261 | 966 |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | 894 |
| LMArena Russian | 1383 | 1111 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1403 | 1111 |
Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.7 leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 74.2 (#101), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 52.2 (#287)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1404 | 1087 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 47.2% |
Long Context MiniMax-M2.7 leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#94), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#262)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1419 | 1088 |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.7 leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 59.1 (#107), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.3 (#279)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1404 | 1110 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1354 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1413 | 1068 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 12.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiniMax-M2.7 better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?
MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiniMax-M2.7 or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?
MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.7 and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.7 has 30 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.