Noometry

Model comparison

MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Super

Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2.7 MiniMax

37.7

Rank #196 Confirmed

Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA

40.1

Rank #153 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher in 6 categories and Nemotron 3 Super in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Nemotron 3 Super leads 39.6 to 25.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 47% for MiniMax-M2.7 and 36% for Nemotron 3 Super.
  • Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.45 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M2.7.
  • Nemotron 3 Super accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 205K.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2.7Nemotron 3 Super
ProviderMiniMaxNVIDIA
Noometry Index37.740.1
Released2026-03-182026-03-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window205K262K
Max output131K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.30$0.08
Output $ / M tokens$1.20$0.45
Results tracked3021

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120), Nemotron 3 Super: 39.4 (#158)

BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Nemotron 3 Super
SciCode47%36%
WeirdML37%38%
LMArena Coding14541403
ALE-Bench599.25213.9
LMArena WebDev1398—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111), Nemotron 3 Super: —

BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Nemotron 3 Super
Terminal-Bench45.1%—
ExploitBench13.3%—
GBAEval0%—

Reasoning Too close to call

MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253), Nemotron 3 Super: 18.7 (#276)

BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Nemotron 3 Super
NYT Connections (extended)24.7%15.4%
CritPt0.6%3.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts14221386
Thematic Generalization39.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index145.85—

Math Nemotron 3 Super leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263), Nemotron 3 Super: 39.6 (#101)

BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Math14201380
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—60.4%
ProofBench3%—

Knowledge Nemotron 3 Super leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152), Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#139)

BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Expert14441398
Vectara Hallucination Rate12.9%—

Multilingual MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123), Nemotron 3 Super: 48.4 (#144)

BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Non-English13821355
LMArena Chinese14411432
LMArena French14211405
LMArena German13981341
LMArena Russian13831336
LMArena Spanish14031417
LMArena Japanese1262—
LMArena Korean1313—

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103), Nemotron 3 Super: 71.2 (#154)

BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Instruction Following14051347

Long Context MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99), Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#139)

BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Longer Query14191362

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112), Nemotron 3 Super: 55.9 (#140)

BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text14051378
LMArena Creative Writing13541317
LMArena Multi-Turn14121369

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2.7 better than Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2.7 or Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M2.7 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

Is MiniMax-M2.7 or Nemotron 3 Super better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 39.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nemotron 3 Super does, with 262K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.7 and Nemotron 3 Super share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.7 has 30 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Super has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper