Model comparison

MiniMax-M2.7 vs Mistral Small

MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small costs 2.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiniMax-M2.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2.7 MiniMax

37.7

Rank #196 Confirmed

Mistral Small Mistral AI

33.4

Rank #243 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher in 7 categories and Mistral Small in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiniMax-M2.7 leads 25.9 to 16.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 47% for MiniMax-M2.7 and 26.5% for Mistral Small.
  • Mistral Small is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M2.7.
  • Mistral Small accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 205K.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2.7 and Mistral Small specifications
MiniMax-M2.7Mistral Small
ProviderMiniMaxMistral AI
Noometry Index37.733.4
Released2026-03-182024-02-26
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window205K262K
Max output131K256K
Input $ / M tokens$0.30$0.15
Output $ / M tokens$1.20$0.60
Results tracked3039

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120), Mistral Small: 34.0 (#247)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Mistral Small
SciCode47%26.5%
LMArena Coding14541362
ALE-Bench599.25497.62
LMArena WebDev1398—
WeirdML37%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—36.1%
LiveBench Coding—36.2%
BigCodeBench Complete—46.6%

Agentic & Tool Use Mistral Small leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111), Mistral Small: 28.1 (#93)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Mistral Small
Terminal-Bench45.1%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—37.1%
ExploitBench13.3%—
GBAEval0%—

Reasoning Too close to call

MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253), Mistral Small: 19.8 (#250)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Mistral Small
CritPt0.6%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts14221335
Kagi LLM Benchmark—37.8%
NYT Connections (extended)24.7%—
Thematic Generalization39.3%—
LiveBench Reasoning—44.8%
DTBench—70.9%
LiveBench Data Analysis—53.7%
LMCA—20.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index145.85—
LiveBench—44%

Math MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263), Mistral Small: 16.4 (#293)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Mistral Small
LMArena Math14201341
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—5.8%
ProofBench3%—
LiveBench Math—39.9%
MATH Level 5—46.8%

Knowledge MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152), Mistral Small: 31.0 (#222)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Mistral Small
Vectara Hallucination Rate12.9%5.1%
LMArena Expert14441291
GPQA Diamond—47.5%
MMLU—68.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

MiniMax-M2.7: —, Mistral Small: 33.5 (#96)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Mistral Small
LMArena Vision—1142

Multilingual MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123), Mistral Small: 45.5 (#169)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Mistral Small
LMArena Non-English13821315
LMArena Chinese14411340
LMArena French14211337
LMArena German13981340
LMArena Japanese12621275
LMArena Korean13131259
LMArena Russian13831324
LMArena Spanish14031346

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103), Mistral Small: 66.4 (#209)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Mistral Small
LMArena Instruction Following14051310
LiveBench Instruction Following—63.7%

Long Context MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99), Mistral Small: 40.4 (#156)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Mistral Small
LMArena Longer Query14191327

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112), Mistral Small: 52.5 (#171)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Mistral Small
LMArena Text14051338
LMArena Creative Writing13541305
LMArena Multi-Turn14121344
LiveBench Language—30.5%

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2.7 better than Mistral Small?

MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small costs 2.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiniMax-M2.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2.7 or Mistral Small?

Mistral Small is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M2.7 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

Is MiniMax-M2.7 or Mistral Small better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Small does, with 262K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.7 and Mistral Small share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.7 has 30 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper