Model comparison
MiniMax-M2.7 vs Mistral
MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher in 7 categories and Mistral in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.7 leads 58.9 to 37.0.
- MiniMax-M2.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiniMax-M2.7 | Mistral | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 29.9 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 205K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 30 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M2.7 leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120), Mistral: 33.8 (#250)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1162 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1398 | — |
| SciCode | 47% | — |
| WeirdML | 37% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 599.25 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111), Mistral: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 45.1% | — |
| ExploitBench | 13.3% | — |
| GBAEval | 0% | — |
Reasoning Mistral leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253), Mistral: 22.2 (#200)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1422 | 1149 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 24.7% | — |
| CritPt | 0.6% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 39.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.85 | — |
Math MiniMax-M2.7 leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263), Mistral: 22.3 (#278)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1420 | 1180 |
| ProofBench | 3% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 7.2% |
Knowledge MiniMax-M2.7 leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152), Mistral: 16.6 (#288)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1444 | 1125 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 27.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.3% |
Multilingual MiniMax-M2.7 leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123), Mistral: 32.8 (#254)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1129 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1441 | 1109 |
| LMArena French | 1421 | 1180 |
| LMArena German | 1398 | 1155 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1262 | 1013 |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | 1032 |
| LMArena Russian | 1383 | 1168 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1403 | 1143 |
Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.7 leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103), Mistral: 52.6 (#288)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1405 | 1152 |
| IFEval | — | 56.8% |
Long Context MiniMax-M2.7 leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99), Mistral: 35.0 (#245)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1419 | 1153 |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.7 leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112), Mistral: 37.0 (#260)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1405 | 1165 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1354 | 1158 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1412 | 1147 |
| WildBench | — | 66% |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiniMax-M2.7 better than Mistral?
MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiniMax-M2.7 or Mistral better for coding?
MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.7 and Mistral share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.7 has 30 scored results on Noometry and Mistral has 22.