Model comparison

MiniMax-M2.7 vs Mistral

MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2.7 MiniMax

37.7

Rank #196 Confirmed

Mistral Mistral AI

29.9

Rank #303 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher in 7 categories and Mistral in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.7 leads 58.9 to 37.0.
  • MiniMax-M2.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2.7 and Mistral specifications
MiniMax-M2.7Mistral
ProviderMiniMaxMistral AI
Noometry Index37.729.9
Released2026-03-18—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked3022

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120), Mistral: 33.8 (#250)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Mistral
LMArena Coding14541162
LMArena WebDev1398—
SciCode47%—
WeirdML37%—
ALE-Bench599.25—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111), Mistral: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Mistral
Terminal-Bench45.1%—
ExploitBench13.3%—
GBAEval0%—

Reasoning Mistral leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253), Mistral: 22.2 (#200)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Mistral
LMArena Hard Prompts14221149
NYT Connections (extended)24.7%—
CritPt0.6%—
Thematic Generalization39.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index145.85—

Math MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263), Mistral: 22.3 (#278)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Mistral
LMArena Math14201180
ProofBench3%—
Omni-MATH—7.2%

Knowledge MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152), Mistral: 16.6 (#288)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Mistral
LMArena Expert14441125
MMLU-Pro—27.7%
Vectara Hallucination Rate12.9%—
GPQA (HELM)—30.3%

Multilingual MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123), Mistral: 32.8 (#254)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Mistral
LMArena Non-English13821129
LMArena Chinese14411109
LMArena French14211180
LMArena German13981155
LMArena Japanese12621013
LMArena Korean13131032
LMArena Russian13831168
LMArena Spanish14031143

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103), Mistral: 52.6 (#288)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Mistral
LMArena Instruction Following14051152
IFEval—56.8%

Long Context MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99), Mistral: 35.0 (#245)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Mistral
LMArena Longer Query14191153

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112), Mistral: 37.0 (#260)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.7Mistral
LMArena Text14051165
LMArena Creative Writing13541158
LMArena Multi-Turn14121147
WildBench—66%

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2.7 better than Mistral?

MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiniMax-M2.7 or Mistral better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.7 and Mistral share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.7 has 30 scored results on Noometry and Mistral has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper