Model comparison

MiniMax-M2.5 vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

MiniMax-M2.5 and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.3 vs 39.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2.5 MiniMax

38.3

Rank #188 Confirmed

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 StepFun

39.2

Rank #171 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher in 5 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where MiniMax-M2.5 leads 48.1 to 38.5.
  • MiniMax-M2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2.5 and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 specifications
MiniMax-M2.5Step 2 16k Exp 202412
ProviderMiniMaxStepFun
Noometry Index38.339.2
Released2026-02-12—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked3312

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 48.1 (#58), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Coding13811316
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)75.8%—
LMArena WebDev1387—
SWE-bench Multilingual68.3%—
ALE-Bench618.17—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M2.5: 30.4 (#77), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Step 2 16k Exp 202412
Terminal-Bench42.7%—
Vending-Bench 2-23.16—

Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 17.5 (#292), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Hard Prompts13721299
ARC-AGI-24.9%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark55.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)16.8%—
ARC-AGI-163.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.68—

Math Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 26.9 (#253), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Math13781304
ProofBench4%—

Knowledge MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 39.2 (#135), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Expert13791279
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.1%—

Multilingual MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 47.1 (#152), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Non-English13381290
LMArena Chinese13931331
LMArena Russian13581324
LMArena French1362—
LMArena German1362—
LMArena Japanese1171—
LMArena Korean1232—
LMArena Spanish1354—

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 71.5 (#148), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Instruction Following13531287

Long Context Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 37.5 (#216), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Longer Query13661307
CL-bench11.4%—
CL-bench Life6.3%—

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 53.9 (#153), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Text13591321
LMArena Creative Writing13311328
LMArena Multi-Turn13641292
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1361—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2.5 better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

MiniMax-M2.5 and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.3 vs 39.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is MiniMax-M2.5 or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.1 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.5 and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.5 has 33 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper