Model comparison

MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2.5 MiniMax

38.3

Rank #188 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #71 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 30.8 to 17.5.
  • MiniMax-M2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2.5 and Qwen3.5 Max Preview specifications
MiniMax-M2.5Qwen3.5 Max Preview
ProviderMiniMaxAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index38.345.3
Released2026-02-12—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked3317

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 48.1 (#58), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Coding13811487
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)75.8%—
LMArena WebDev1387—
SWE-bench Multilingual68.3%—
ALE-Bench618.17—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M2.5: 30.4 (#77), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Qwen3.5 Max Preview
Terminal-Bench42.7%—
Vending-Bench 2-23.16—

Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 17.5 (#292), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts13721483
ARC-AGI-24.9%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark55.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)16.8%—
ARC-AGI-163.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.68—

Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 26.9 (#253), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Math13781474
ProofBench4%—

Knowledge Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 39.2 (#135), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Expert13791489
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.1%—

Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 47.1 (#152), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English13381465
LMArena Chinese13931534
LMArena French13621484
LMArena German13621487
LMArena Japanese11711495
LMArena Korean12321438
LMArena Russian13581471
LMArena Spanish13541470

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 71.5 (#148), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following13531467

Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 37.5 (#216), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query13661476
CL-bench11.4%—
CL-bench Life6.3%—

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 53.9 (#153), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Text13591470
LMArena Creative Writing13311464
LMArena Multi-Turn13641478
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1361—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2.5 better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiniMax-M2.5 or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.1 versus 44.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.5 and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.5 has 33 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper