Model comparison

MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

MiniMax-M2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2.5 MiniMax

38.3

Rank #188 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where MiniMax-M2.5 leads 48.1 to 35.2.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2.5 and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct specifications
MiniMax-M2.5Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderMiniMaxNVIDIA
Noometry Index38.335.9
Released2026-02-122024-06-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked3317

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 48.1 (#58), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding13811209
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)75.8%—
LMArena WebDev1387—
SWE-bench Multilingual68.3%—
ALE-Bench618.17—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M2.5: 30.4 (#77), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
Terminal-Bench42.7%—
Vending-Bench 2-23.16—

Reasoning Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 17.5 (#292), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13721202
ARC-AGI-24.9%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark55.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)16.8%—
ARC-AGI-163.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.68—

Math Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 26.9 (#253), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Math13781216
ProofBench4%—

Knowledge MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 39.2 (#135), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Expert13791171
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.1%—

Multilingual MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 47.1 (#152), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13381206
LMArena Chinese13931214
LMArena French13621197
LMArena German13621192
LMArena Japanese11711128
LMArena Korean12321148
LMArena Russian13581219
LMArena Spanish13541195

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 71.5 (#148), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13531203

Long Context Too close to call

MiniMax-M2.5: 37.5 (#216), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13661225
CL-bench11.4%—
CL-bench Life6.3%—

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 53.9 (#153), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text13591225
LMArena Creative Writing13311203
LMArena Multi-Turn13641214
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1361—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2.5 better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

MiniMax-M2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiniMax-M2.5 or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.1 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.5 and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.5 has 33 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper