Model comparison

MiniMax-M2.1 vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

MiniMax-M2.1 and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.9 vs 39.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2.1 MiniMax

38.9

Rank #178 Confirmed

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 StepFun

39.2

Rank #171 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 25.9 to 16.6.
  • MiniMax-M2.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2.1 and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 specifications
MiniMax-M2.1Step 2 16k Exp 202412
ProviderMiniMaxStepFun
Noometry Index38.939.2
Released2025-12-23—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked2212

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 40.4 (#143), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Coding14211316
LMArena WebDev1384—
ALE-Bench623.83—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M2.1: 27.9 (#98), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Step 2 16k Exp 202412
Terminal-Bench36.6%—

Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 16.6 (#302), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Hard Prompts14111299
NYT Connections (extended)11.2%—

Math MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#138), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Math13971304

Knowledge MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#147), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Expert14311279
Vectara Hallucination Rate11.8%—

Multilingual MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 50.0 (#128), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Non-English13781290
LMArena Chinese14301331
LMArena Russian13871324
LMArena French1404—
LMArena German1381—
LMArena Japanese1287—
LMArena Korean1298—
LMArena Spanish1397—

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 73.8 (#112), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Instruction Following14001287

Long Context MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#101), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Longer Query14161307

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 58.3 (#120), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Text13921321
LMArena Creative Writing13611328
LMArena Multi-Turn13961292

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2.1 better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

MiniMax-M2.1 and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.9 vs 39.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is MiniMax-M2.1 or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.1 and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.1 has 22 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper