Model comparison
MiniMax-M2.1 vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MiniMax
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M2.1 leads 38.3 to 18.3.
Side by side
| MiniMax-M2.1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 38.9 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2025-12-23 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 205K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 22 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M2.1 leads
MiniMax-M2.1: 40.4 (#143), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1384 | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1421 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 623.83 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiniMax-M2.1: 27.9 (#98), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 36.6% | — |
Reasoning MiniMax-M2.1 leads
MiniMax-M2.1: 16.6 (#302), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 11.2% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1411 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math MiniMax-M2.1 leads
MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#138), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1397 | — |
Knowledge MiniMax-M2.1 leads
MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#147), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 11.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1431 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiniMax-M2.1: 50.0 (#128), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1378 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1430 | — |
| LMArena French | 1404 | — |
| LMArena German | 1381 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1397 | — |
Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.1 leads
MiniMax-M2.1: 73.8 (#112), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#101), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | — |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.1 leads
MiniMax-M2.1: 58.3 (#120), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1361 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1396 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiniMax-M2.1 better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiniMax-M2.1 or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
MiniMax-M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.1 and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.1 has 22 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.