Model comparison
MiniMax M1 vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax M1 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax M1 leads 36.4 to 19.5.
Side by side
| MiniMax M1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 40.3 | 32.7 |
| Released | 2025-06-13 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 40K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.55 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1359 | 1210 |
Reasoning MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1339 | 1208 |
Math MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1361 | 1208 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
Knowledge MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1317 | — |
Multilingual MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1319 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1360 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1329 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1370 | — |
| LMArena German | 1350 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1217 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1266 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1353 | — |
Instruction Following MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1312 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |
Long Context MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1326 | 1194 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 69.4% | — |
Writing & Preference MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1343 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1298 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1335 | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiniMax M1 better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiniMax M1 or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
MiniMax M1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiniMax M1 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax M1 has 18 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.