Model comparison

MiniMax M1 vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax M1 MiniMax

40.3

Rank #150 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax M1 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax M1 leads 36.4 to 19.5.

Side by side

MiniMax M1 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
MiniMax M1Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderMiniMaxAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index40.332.7
Released2025-06-13—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output40K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.55—
Output $ / M tokens$2.20—
Results tracked1816

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax M1 leads

MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding13591210

Reasoning MiniMax M1 leads

MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13391208

Math MiniMax M1 leads

MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math13611208
Omni-MATH—16.1%

Knowledge MiniMax M1 leads

MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
LMArena Expert1317—

Multilingual MiniMax M1 leads

MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13191160
LMArena Chinese13601192
LMArena Russian13291187
LMArena French1370—
LMArena German1350—
LMArena Japanese1217—
LMArena Korean1266—
LMArena Spanish1353—

Instruction Following MiniMax M1 leads

MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13121186
IFEval—78%

Long Context MiniMax M1 leads

MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13261194
Fiction.LiveBench69.4%—

Writing & Preference MiniMax M1 leads

MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text13431218
LMArena Creative Writing12981199
LMArena Multi-Turn13351221
WildBench—73.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax M1 better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiniMax M1 or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

MiniMax M1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax M1 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax M1 has 18 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper