Model comparison

MiniMax M1 vs Mistral Nemo

MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 6.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiniMax M1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax M1 MiniMax

40.3

Rank #150 Confirmed

Mistral Nemo Mistral AI

26.4

Rank #337 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax M1 leads 53.1 to 28.5.
  • Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.55 / $2.20 for MiniMax M1.
  • MiniMax M1 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

MiniMax M1 and Mistral Nemo specifications
MiniMax M1Mistral Nemo
ProviderMiniMaxMistral AI
Noometry Index40.326.4
Released2025-06-132024-07-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M128K
Max output40K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.55$0.15
Output $ / M tokens$2.20$0.15
Results tracked1810

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153), Mistral Nemo: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Nemo
LMArena Coding1359—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax M1: —, Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Nemo
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—27.6%
BALROG—17.6%

Reasoning MiniMax M1 leads

MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126), Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Nemo
LMArena Hard Prompts1339—
DTBench—48.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—118.68
PIQA—83.5%

Math MiniMax M1 leads

MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151), Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Nemo
LMArena Math1361—
MATH Level 5—10.8%
GSM8K—84.2%

Knowledge MiniMax M1 leads

MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170), Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Nemo
GPQA Diamond—29.9%
LMArena Expert1317—
BoolQ—82.5%

Multilingual Not comparable

MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163), Mistral Nemo: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Nemo
LMArena Non-English1319—
LMArena Chinese1360—
LMArena French1370—
LMArena German1350—
LMArena Japanese1217—
LMArena Korean1266—
LMArena Russian1329—
LMArena Spanish1353—

Instruction Following Not comparable

MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174), Mistral Nemo: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Nemo
LMArena Instruction Following1312—

Long Context Not comparable

MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141), Mistral Nemo: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Nemo
Fiction.LiveBench69.4%—
LMArena Longer Query1326—

Writing & Preference MiniMax M1 leads

MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161), Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Nemo
LMArena Text1343—
LMArena Creative Writing1298—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—881
LMArena Multi-Turn1335—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax M1 better than Mistral Nemo?

MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 6.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiniMax M1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M1 or Mistral Nemo?

Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; MiniMax M1 lists at $0.55 and $2.20.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiniMax M1 does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax M1 and Mistral Nemo share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax M1 has 18 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper