Model comparison

MiniMax-01 vs Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#51); MiniMax-01 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-01 MiniMax

33.4

Unranked Sparse

Muse Spark 1.1 Meta

49.9

Rank #51 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 47.1 to 22.4.
  • MiniMax-01 is cheaper at $0.20 / $1.10 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.1.
  • Muse Spark 1.1 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
  • MiniMax-01 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiniMax-01 and Muse Spark 1.1 specifications
MiniMax-01Muse Spark 1.1
ProviderMiniMaxMeta
Noometry Index33.449.9
Released—2026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1M1.05M
Max output900K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.20$1.25
Output $ / M tokens$1.10$4.25
Results tracked237

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

MiniMax-01: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-01Muse Spark 1.1
DeepSWE—53.3%
LMArena WebDev—1542
SciCode—58.8%
LMArena Coding—1498

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-01: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-01Muse Spark 1.1
APEX-Agents—31.8%
τ²-bench Banking—40.5%
GBAEval—7.9%
GDP.pdf—15%
Vending-Bench 2—6,520

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads

MiniMax-01: 22.4, Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-01Muse Spark 1.1
Kagi LLM Benchmark42.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)—84.9%
CritPt—15.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1486
DTBench—94.4%
LMCA—49.9%
Surface Evolver Bench—52.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—154.21

Math Not comparable

MiniMax-01: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-01Muse Spark 1.1
ProofBench—39%
LMArena Math—1483

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.1 leads

MiniMax-01: 33.6, Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-01Muse Spark 1.1
SimpleQA Verified—57.8%
Confabulations23.9%—
LMArena Expert—1478

Multimodal Not comparable

MiniMax-01: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-01Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision—1293
LMArena Document—1465

Multilingual Not comparable

MiniMax-01: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-01Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Non-English—1472
LMArena Chinese—1518
LMArena French—1494
LMArena German—1466
LMArena Japanese—1451
LMArena Korean—1458
LMArena Russian—1483
LMArena Spanish—1464

Instruction Following Not comparable

MiniMax-01: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-01Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Instruction Following—1457

Long Context Not comparable

MiniMax-01: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-01Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Longer Query—1462

Writing & Preference Not comparable

MiniMax-01: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-01Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text—1479
LMArena Creative Writing—1437
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1927
EQ-Bench 4—1260
LMArena Multi-Turn—1485

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-01 better than Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#51); MiniMax-01 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax-01 or Muse Spark 1.1?

MiniMax-01 is cheaper. It lists at $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.10 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 lists at $1.25 and $4.25.

Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.1 does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-01 and Muse Spark 1.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-01 has 2 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper