Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Pro vs Step 1o Turbo 202506

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Pro Xiaomi

42.4

Rank #102 Confirmed

Step 1o Turbo 202506 StepFun

39.1

Rank #160 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Step 1o Turbo 202506 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.9 to 53.4.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-Pro and Step 1o Turbo 202506 specifications
MiMo-V2-ProStep 1o Turbo 202506
ProviderXiaomiStepFun
Noometry Index42.439.1
Released2026-03-18—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.43—
Output $ / M tokens$0.87—
Results tracked2314

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.4 (#76), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 38.6 (#158)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Coding14761339
LMArena WebDev1433—
ALE-Bench785.17—

Reasoning Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 21.3 (#200), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 25.7 (#127)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Hard Prompts14571336
NYT Connections (extended)25.8%—
Thematic Generalization45.9%—

Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 36.7 (#104), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 33.9 (#163)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Math14471318

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 40.8 (#106), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 35.5 (#174)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Expert14791308

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Pro: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 35.4 (#75)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Vision—1186

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.9 (#77), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 45.5 (#168)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Non-English14161313
LMArena Chinese14551380
LMArena German14171315
LMArena Russian14271327
LMArena French1470—
LMArena Japanese1366—
LMArena Korean1401—
LMArena Spanish1458—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.2 (#46), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 69.4 (#171)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Instruction Following14441311

Long Context Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#133), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 41.1 (#141)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Longer Query14551350
CL-bench15.7%—
CL-bench Life6.9%—

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.9 (#67), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 53.4 (#154)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Text14361336
LMArena Creative Writing14151308
LMArena Multi-Turn14561341

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than Step 1o Turbo 202506?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiMo-V2-Pro or Step 1o Turbo 202506 better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and Step 1o Turbo 202506 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and Step 1o Turbo 202506 has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper