Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Pro vs o3-pro

MiMo-V2-Pro and o3-pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.0 vs 42.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Pro Xiaomi

43.0

Rank #103 Confirmed

o3-pro OpenAI

42.9

Rank #105 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.2 to 41.5.
  • MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $20 / $80 for o3-pro.
  • MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 200K.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-Pro and o3-pro specifications
MiMo-V2-Proo3-pro
ProviderXiaomiOpenAI
Noometry Index43.042.9
Released2026-03-182025-06-10
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M200K
Max output131K100K
Input $ / M tokens$0.43$20
Output $ / M tokens$0.87$80
Results tracked2312

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o3-pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83), o3-pro: 55.5 (#24)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-Proo3-pro
Aider Polyglot—84.9%
LMArena WebDev1433—
WeirdML—58.2%
LMArena Coding1476—
ALE-Bench785.17—

Reasoning o3-pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206), o3-pro: 23.8 (#171)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-Proo3-pro
ARC-AGI-2—4.9%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—72.1%
NYT Connections (extended)25.8%—
ARC-AGI-1—59.3%
Thematic Generalization45.9%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1457—
DTBench—86.9%
LMCA—38.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.42

Math Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102), o3-pro: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-Proo3-pro
LMArena Math1447—

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111), o3-pro: 29.5 (#238)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-Proo3-pro
Confabulations—14.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—23.3%
LMArena Expert1478—

Multilingual Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81), o3-pro: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-Proo3-pro
LMArena Non-English1416—
LMArena Chinese1456—
LMArena French1469—
LMArena German1417—
LMArena Japanese1366—
LMArena Korean1400—
LMArena Russian1427—
LMArena Spanish1457—

Instruction Following Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49), o3-pro: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-Proo3-pro
LMArena Instruction Following1445—

Long Context o3-pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138), o3-pro: 72.2 (#1)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-Proo3-pro
Fiction.LiveBench—97.2%
CL-bench15.7%—
CL-bench Life6.9%—
LMArena Longer Query1455—

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70), o3-pro: 57.1 (#133)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-Proo3-pro
LMArena Text1436—
LMArena Creative Writing1415—
Short-Story Creative Writing—84.4%
LMArena Multi-Turn1456—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than o3-pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro and o3-pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.0 vs 42.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Pro or o3-pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; o3-pro lists at $20 and $80.

Is MiMo-V2-Pro or o3-pro better for coding?

o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 43.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and o3-pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper