Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Omni vs Solar Pro4
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
UpstageSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher in 8 categories and Solar Pro4 in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 61.4 to 56.5.
- MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for Solar Pro4.
- Solar Pro4 accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 262K.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Omni | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 524K |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | 1437 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1399 |
Math Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1430 | 1416 |
Knowledge Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | 1427 |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63), Solar Pro4: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1415 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | 1397 |
| LMArena German | 1399 | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1317 | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | 1355 | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | 1412 | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1434 | 1401 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1428 | 1377 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1381 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1423 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1385 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than Solar Pro4?
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Omni or Solar Pro4?
MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Solar Pro4 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.
Is MiMo-V2-Omni or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Solar Pro4 does, with 524K tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and Solar Pro4 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.