Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Omni vs Ring-2.6-1T
MiMo-V2-Omni has enough public results to be ranked (#88); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Ant Group (inclusionAI)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 29.7 to 26.1.
- Ring-2.6-1T has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Omni | Ring-2.6-1T | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 36.9 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | 2026-05-14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89), Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88), Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | — |
Math Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1430 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | — |
| LMArena French | 1447 | — |
| LMArena German | 1399 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1317 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1434 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1428 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1423 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than Ring-2.6-1T?
MiMo-V2-Omni has enough public results to be ranked (#88); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is MiMo-V2-Omni or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 40.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and Ring-2.6-1T share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.