Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Omni vs Qwen2-72B
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2-72B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 61.6 to 41.0.
- Qwen2-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2-72B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 29.5 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | 2024-06-07 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 26 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87), Qwen2-72B: 28.7 (#303)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1467 | 1196 |
| WeirdML | — | 11.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.5% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: —, Qwen2-72B: 16.9 (#138)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86), Qwen2-72B: 22.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1191 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.27 |
Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112), Qwen2-72B: 27.9 (#232)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1432 | 1235 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.1% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114), Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#270)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | 1171 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.8% |
| MMLU | — | 82.4% |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62), Qwen2-72B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97), Qwen2-72B: 36.0 (#239)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | 1240 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | 1169 |
| LMArena German | 1398 | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1318 | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | 1355 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1412 | 1169 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1432 | 1168 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62), Qwen2-72B: 62.0 (#236)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1428 | 1181 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72), Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#230)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1193 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83), Qwen2-72B: 41.0 (#236)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1424 | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1393 | 1181 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1446 | 1195 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than Qwen2-72B?
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2-Omni or Qwen2-72B better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and Qwen2-72B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.