Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Omni vs Qwen2.5-Max
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 40.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5-Max in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 61.6 to 55.6.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2.5-Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 40.1 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | 2025-01-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.2 (#118)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1467 | 1359 |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 64.4% |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86), Qwen2.5-Max: 24.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1360 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 51.4% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 67.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 132.54 |
| LiveBench | — | 62.3% |
Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112), Qwen2.5-Max: 34.3 (#162)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1432 | 1369 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 58.4% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114), Qwen2.5-Max: 34.8 (#181)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | 1337 |
| Confabulations | — | 21.8% |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62), Qwen2.5-Max: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97), Qwen2.5-Max: 48.3 (#140)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1352 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | 1382 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | 1396 |
| LMArena German | 1398 | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1318 | 1299 |
| LMArena Korean | 1355 | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | 1412 | 1353 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1432 | 1377 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62), Qwen2.5-Max: 71.5 (#147)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1428 | 1335 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 75.3% |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.3 (#137)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1358 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83), Qwen2.5-Max: 55.6 (#141)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1424 | 1367 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1393 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1446 | 1364 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 72.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 56.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than Qwen2.5-Max?
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 40.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2-Omni or Qwen2.5-Max better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 41.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and Qwen2.5-Max share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Max has 27.