Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Omni vs Qwen1.5-72B
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 40.5 to 11.5.
- Qwen1.5-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen1.5-72B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89), Qwen1.5-72B: 31.9 (#277)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | 1165 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.6% |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88), Qwen1.5-72B: 22.2 (#203)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1148 |
Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#205)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1430 | 1164 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118), Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#300)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | 1136 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.8% |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63), Qwen1.5-72B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#253)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1135 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1186 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | 1159 |
| LMArena German | 1399 | 1084 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1317 | 1061 |
| LMArena Korean | 1355 | 1050 |
| LMArena Russian | 1412 | 1104 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1434 | 1110 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66), Qwen1.5-72B: 59.3 (#256)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1428 | 1141 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76), Qwen1.5-72B: 35.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1157 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87), Qwen1.5-72B: 37.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1423 | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1137 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than Qwen1.5-72B?
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2-Omni or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and Qwen1.5-72B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.