Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Flash vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 8.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Step 5 Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

40.8

Rank #137 Confirmed

Step 5 Preview StepFun

43.8

Rank #78 Reported

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 0 categories and Step 5 Preview in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Step 5 Preview leads 50.6 to 35.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 25.9% for MiMo-V2-Flash and 58.9% for Step 5 Preview.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $2.70 for Step 5 Preview.
  • Step 5 Preview accepts more context: 1.02M tokens versus 262K.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-Flash and Step 5 Preview specifications
MiMo-V2-FlashStep 5 Preview
ProviderXiaomiStepFun
Noometry Index40.843.8
Released2025-12-162026-09-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K1.02M
Max output66K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.14$1
Output $ / M tokens$0.28$2.70
Results tracked213

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 5 Preview leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.8 (#205), Step 5 Preview: 50.6 (#40)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashStep 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev13301569
SciCode25.9%58.9%
LMArena Coding1443—
ALE-Bench737.95—

Reasoning Step 5 Preview leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.1 (#155), Step 5 Preview: 38.0 (#58)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashStep 5 Preview
CritPt0%20.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts1420—

Math Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.6 (#141), Step 5 Preview: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashStep 5 Preview
LMArena Math1396—

Knowledge Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.1 (#126), Step 5 Preview: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashStep 5 Preview
LMArena Expert1425—

Multilingual Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.1 (#109), Step 5 Preview: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashStep 5 Preview
LMArena Non-English1391—
LMArena Chinese1463—
LMArena French1429—
LMArena German1395—
LMArena Japanese1324—
LMArena Korean1358—
LMArena Russian1387—
LMArena Spanish1420—

Instruction Following Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.7 (#115), Step 5 Preview: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashStep 5 Preview
LMArena Instruction Following1392—

Long Context Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#106), Step 5 Preview: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashStep 5 Preview
LMArena Longer Query1409—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.9 (#101), Step 5 Preview: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashStep 5 Preview
LMArena Text1411—
LMArena Creative Writing1375—
LMArena Multi-Turn1404—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 8.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Step 5 Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash or Step 5 Preview?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Step 5 Preview lists at $1 and $2.70.

Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Step 5 Preview better for coding?

Step 5 Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.6 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Step 5 Preview does, with 1.02M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Step 5 Preview share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Step 5 Preview has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper