Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash vs Qwen3 Coder Next
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 Coder Next in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 25.9% for MiMo-V2-Flash and 32.3% for Qwen3 Coder Next.
- MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.12 / $0.80 for Qwen3 Coder Next.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 34.3 |
| Released | 2025-12-16 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 66K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 25.9% | 32.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | — |
Math Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | — |
| LMArena French | 1429 | — |
| LMArena German | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash or Qwen3 Coder Next?
MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder Next lists at $0.12 and $0.80.
Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (36.1 vs 36.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 262K tokens.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.