Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Flash vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.4 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 21× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified October 10, 2026. 16 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

40.8

Rank #137 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Max

Alibaba (Qwen)

51.4

Rank #35 Confirmed

Summary

They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 62.3 to 35.6.
The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 25.9% for MiMo-V2-Flash and 48.8% for Qwen3.7 Max.
MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3.7 Max.
Qwen3.7 Max accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-Flash and Qwen3.7 Max specifications
	MiMo-V2-Flash	Qwen3.7 Max
Provider	Xiaomi	Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index	40.8	51.4
Released	2025-12-16	2026-05-19
Weights	Open	Proprietary
Context window	262K	1M
Max output	66K	131K
Input $ / M tokens	$0.14	$2.50
Output $ / M tokens	$0.28	$7.50
Results tracked	21	33

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.8 (#205), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.2 (#43)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmark	MiMo-V2-Flash	Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena WebDev	1330	1515
SciCode	25.9%	48.8%
LMArena Coding	1443	1498
ALE-Bench	737.95	1,189
SWE-bench Verified	—	77.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Flash: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 21.8 (#129)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmark	MiMo-V2-Flash	Qwen3.7 Max
GBAEval	—	0.4%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.1 (#155), Qwen3.7 Max: 48.4 (#36)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmark	MiMo-V2-Flash	Qwen3.7 Max
CritPt	0%	13.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts	1420	1483
SimpleBench	—	70.4%
NYT Connections (extended)	—	85.1%
Chess Puzzles	—	19%
EBR-Bench	—	9.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles	—	32%
DTBench	—	92.3%
LMCA	—	44%
Epoch Capabilities Index	—	153.74

Math Qwen3.7 Max leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.6 (#141), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.3 (#26)

Math benchmarks
Benchmark	MiMo-V2-Flash	Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Math	1396	1488
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)	—	64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4	—	34.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025	—	95.6%
ProofBench	—	26%

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.1 (#126), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.7 (#24)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmark	MiMo-V2-Flash	Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Expert	1425	1488
GPQA Diamond	—	90.9%
SimpleQA Verified	—	55.8%

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Max leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.1 (#109), Qwen3.7 Max: 57.1 (#13)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmark	MiMo-V2-Flash	Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English	1391	1475
LMArena Chinese	1463	1533
LMArena Russian	1387	1482
LMArena French	1429	—
LMArena German	1395	—
LMArena Japanese	1324	—
LMArena Korean	1358	—
LMArena Spanish	1420	—

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Max leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.7 (#115), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.9 (#34)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmark	MiMo-V2-Flash	Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following	1392	1460

Long Context Qwen3.7 Max leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#106), Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#34)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmark	MiMo-V2-Flash	Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query	1409	1484

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Max leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.9 (#101), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.2 (#52)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmark	MiMo-V2-Flash	Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text	1411	1476
LMArena Creative Writing	1375	1450
LMArena Multi-Turn	1404	1482
EQ-Bench 4	—	1110

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash or Qwen3.7 Max?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max lists at $2.50 and $7.50.

Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.2 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Max does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Qwen3.7 Max share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.