Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash vs MiMo-V2-Omni
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 8 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 43.3 to 36.1.
- Both cost about the same: $0.14 input and $0.28 output per million tokens.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 43.6 |
| Released | 2025-12-16 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211), MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | 1466 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| SciCode | 25.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157), MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1445 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
Math Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1430 |
Knowledge Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131), MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | 1449 |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |
Multilingual Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113), MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1429 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | 1395 | 1399 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1325 | 1317 |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | 1412 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | 1434 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | 1428 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | 1442 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | 1423 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | 1445 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than MiMo-V2-Omni?
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash or MiMo-V2-Omni?
MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Flash lists at $0.14 and $0.28.
Is MiMo-V2-Flash or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 262K tokens.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and MiMo-V2-Omni share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.