Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Ring-2.6-1T
MiMo-V2.6-Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#55); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Ant Group (inclusionAI)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 2 categories and Ring-2.6-1T in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 53.4 to 40.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 51.3% for MiMo-V2.6-Flash and 42.4% for Ring-2.6-1T.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ring-2.6-1T | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 48.5 | 36.9 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2026-05-14 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30), Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 51.3% | 42.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1637 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1504 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66), Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 12% | 3.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1482 | — |
Math Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 63% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1468 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1501 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | — |
| LMArena French | 1475 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1409 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1455 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1451 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Ring-2.6-1T?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#55); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 40.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Ring-2.6-1T share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.