Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3-4B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 29.6 to 18.5.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-4B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 44.4 | 31.5 |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1516 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.3 (#94)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 35.7% |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82), Qwen3-4B: 18.5 (#264)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97), Qwen3-4B: 28.5 (#228)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 52.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1477 | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 52.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1516 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1266 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1501 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1424 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1465 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1460 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Qwen3-4B?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Qwen3-4B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.