Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Pixtral Large
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 3 categories and Pixtral Large in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.9 to 32.9.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Pixtral Large.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Pixtral Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 44.4 | 31.7 |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 128K |
| Max output | 131K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $6 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1516 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82), Pixtral Large: 20.9 (#208)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | — |
Math Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1477 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1516 | — |
Multimodal MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39), Pixtral Large: 30.0 (#105)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1266 | 1089 |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1501 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1424 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1465 | — |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61), Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#273)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1408 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 988 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1460 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Pixtral Large?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Pixtral Large?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Pixtral Large lists at $2 and $6.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Pixtral Large share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral Large has 3.