Model comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Muse Spark

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 48.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 5 categories and Muse Spark in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 42.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 63% for MiMo-V2.6-Flash and 17% for Muse Spark.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Muse Spark specifications
MiMo-V2.6-FlashMuse Spark
ProviderXiaomiMeta
Noometry Index48.550.6
Released2026-09-212026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.14—
Output $ / M tokens$0.28—
Results tracked1927

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30), Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashMuse Spark
SciCode51.3%51.5%
LMArena Coding15041481
LMArena WebDev1637—

Reasoning Too close to call

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66), Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashMuse Spark
CritPt12%11.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts14821474
Epoch Capabilities Index—152.04

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52), Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashMuse Spark
ProofBench63%17%
LMArena Math14681455
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99), Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashMuse Spark
LMArena Expert15011457
GPQA Diamond—89.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—40.6%

Multimodal Muse Spark leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47), Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashMuse Spark
LMArena Vision12591306
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Muse Spark leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51), Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashMuse Spark
LMArena Non-English14341464
LMArena Chinese15111509
LMArena French14751497
LMArena Russian14091466
LMArena Spanish14561472
LMArena German—1497
LMArena Korean—1459

Instruction Following Too close to call

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35), Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashMuse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following14631442

Long Context Too close to call

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57), Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashMuse Spark
LMArena Longer Query14631451

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67), Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashMuse Spark
LMArena Text14551474
LMArena Creative Writing14001459
LMArena Multi-Turn14511477

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 48.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Muse Spark better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 46.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Muse Spark share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper