Model comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiniMax M1

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 40.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

MiniMax M1 MiniMax

40.3

Rank #150 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and MiniMax M1 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 51.9 to 37.5.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.55 / $2.20 for MiniMax M1.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiniMax M1 specifications
MiMo-V2.6-FlashMiniMax M1
ProviderXiaomiMiniMax
Noometry Index48.540.3
Released2026-09-212025-06-13
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M1M
Max output131K40K
Input $ / M tokens$0.14$0.55
Output $ / M tokens$0.28$2.20
Results tracked1918

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30), MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashMiniMax M1
LMArena Coding15041359
LMArena WebDev1637—
SciCode51.3%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66), MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashMiniMax M1
LMArena Hard Prompts14821339
CritPt12%—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52), MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashMiniMax M1
LMArena Math14681361
ProofBench63%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99), MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashMiniMax M1
LMArena Expert15011317

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47), MiniMax M1: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashMiniMax M1
LMArena Vision1259—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51), MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashMiniMax M1
LMArena Non-English14341319
LMArena Chinese15111360
LMArena French14751370
LMArena Russian14091329
LMArena Spanish14561353
LMArena German—1350
LMArena Japanese—1217
LMArena Korean—1266

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35), MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashMiniMax M1
LMArena Instruction Following14631312

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57), MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashMiniMax M1
LMArena Longer Query14631326
Fiction.LiveBench—69.4%

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67), MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashMiniMax M1
LMArena Text14551343
LMArena Creative Writing14001298
LMArena Multi-Turn14511335

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than MiniMax M1?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 40.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or MiniMax M1?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiniMax M1 lists at $0.55 and $2.20.

Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or MiniMax M1 better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 39.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiniMax M1 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper