Model comparison

MiMo-V2.5 vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.5 Xiaomi

43.4

Rank #93 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 40.8 to 19.5.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.5 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
MiMo-V2.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderXiaomiAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index43.432.7
Released2026-04-22—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.14—
Output $ / M tokens$0.28—
Results tracked2316

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding14691210
LMArena WebDev1438—
SciCode43.1%—
ALE-Bench513.95—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14501208
CritPt3.7%—

Math MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math14361208
ProofBench16%—
Omni-MATH—16.1%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
LMArena Expert1460—

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Vision1247—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14041160
LMArena Chinese14681192
LMArena Russian13951187
LMArena French1447—
LMArena German1421—
LMArena Japanese1306—
LMArena Korean1363—
LMArena Spanish1416—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14341186
IFEval—78%

Long Context MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14451194

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text14281218
LMArena Creative Writing13931199
LMArena Multi-Turn14451221
WildBench—73.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.5 better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiMo-V2.5 or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper